<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Should a Small Business Choose Foundation Server or WHS</title> <atom:link href="http://www.mswhs.com/2009/11/should-a-small-business-choose-foundation-server-or-whs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2009/11/should-a-small-business-choose-foundation-server-or-whs/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 02:23:14 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Bob Crook</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2009/11/should-a-small-business-choose-foundation-server-or-whs/comment-page-1/#comment-11563</link> <dc:creator>Bob Crook</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:45:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2009/11/10/should-a-small-business-choose-foundation-server-or-whs/#comment-11563</guid> <description>Hopefully one of the things being considered by Microsoft is how to offer more clients that the current limit of ten for WHS.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully one of the things being considered by Microsoft is how to offer more clients that the current limit of ten for WHS.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 29/33 queries in 0.029 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 349/353 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cdn4.mswhs.com

Served from: www.mswhs.com @ 2012-05-25 15:32:50 -->
