<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Two Versions of Windows Home Server</title> <atom:link href="http://www.mswhs.com/2008/09/two-versions-of-windows-home-server/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/09/two-versions-of-windows-home-server/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 02:23:14 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: w3wilkes</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/09/two-versions-of-windows-home-server/comment-page-1/#comment-10305</link> <dc:creator>w3wilkes</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 13:54:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/09/05/two-versions-of-windows-home-server/#comment-10305</guid> <description>2 things...1- I could see 2 versions. Basic for those just looking for backup and file sharing capabilities. Premium for those that want full Media Center integration along with the basic functions.2- The base of both the &quot;Basic&quot; and &quot;Premium&quot; editions of Vail would support up to 10 clients, but sell license packs to add to that initial number of clients in increments of 5 additional clients.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 things&#8230;</p><p>1- I could see 2 versions. Basic for those just looking for backup and file sharing capabilities. Premium for those that want full Media Center integration along with the basic functions.</p><p>2- The base of both the &#8220;Basic&#8221; and &#8220;Premium&#8221; editions of Vail would support up to 10 clients, but sell license packs to add to that initial number of clients in increments of 5 additional clients.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: AsH</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/09/two-versions-of-windows-home-server/comment-page-1/#comment-10304</link> <dc:creator>AsH</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 09:42:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/09/05/two-versions-of-windows-home-server/#comment-10304</guid> <description>Stick with the single version, 1 size fits all! as we all know that many WHS producers will no doubt only bundle the cheapest version of WHS with their machines, why not force them to use the best (and only) version!! come on ppl, think about it...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stick with the single version, 1 size fits all! as we all know that many WHS producers will no doubt only bundle the cheapest version of WHS with their machines, why not force them to use the best (and only) version!! come on ppl, think about it&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jim Reisz</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/09/two-versions-of-windows-home-server/comment-page-1/#comment-10303</link> <dc:creator>Jim Reisz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:43:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/09/05/two-versions-of-windows-home-server/#comment-10303</guid> <description>I prefer the single version of WHS, but why make a limitation to the number of home computers that can be backed up?  If your WHS hardware is capable of backing up 20 home computers and you have that many home computers then why not use your home server to its full potential.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer the single version of WHS, but why make a limitation to the number of home computers that can be backed up?  If your WHS hardware is capable of backing up 20 home computers and you have that many home computers then why not use your home server to its full potential.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: digital</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/09/two-versions-of-windows-home-server/comment-page-1/#comment-10302</link> <dc:creator>digital</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 21:02:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/09/05/two-versions-of-windows-home-server/#comment-10302</guid> <description>I think it&#039;s better to stick with 1 version.. don&#039;t go down the Vista road..</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s better to stick with 1 version.. don&#8217;t go down the Vista road..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jay</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/09/two-versions-of-windows-home-server/comment-page-1/#comment-10301</link> <dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:48:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/09/05/two-versions-of-windows-home-server/#comment-10301</guid> <description>We currently have 7 machines that are being backed up, 3 more that are not being backed up, and 1 machine that was archived before being rebuilt, for a total of 11 in the house. It&#039;s very likely that we will need to be backing up additional machines in the future, exceeding the 10 machine limit. Hopefully my EX470 can be upgraded in the future to a newer version of WHS that supports more than 10 clients.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We currently have 7 machines that are being backed up, 3 more that are not being backed up, and 1 machine that was archived before being rebuilt, for a total of 11 in the house. It&#8217;s very likely that we will need to be backing up additional machines in the future, exceeding the 10 machine limit. Hopefully my EX470 can be upgraded in the future to a newer version of WHS that supports more than 10 clients.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WHS Vail to include Windows Media Center Integration &#171; MS Windows Home Server</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/09/two-versions-of-windows-home-server/comment-page-1/#comment-10300</link> <dc:creator>WHS Vail to include Windows Media Center Integration &#171; MS Windows Home Server</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:31:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/09/05/two-versions-of-windows-home-server/#comment-10300</guid> <description>[...] Also mentioned is that&#160; new connected home capabilities would include&#160; multiple SKUs: “premium” and “basic” as we discussed in our previous post Two Versions of Windows Home Server. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Also mentioned is that&#160; new connected home capabilities would include&#160; multiple SKUs: “premium” and “basic” as we discussed in our previous post Two Versions of Windows Home Server. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 29/36 queries in 0.009 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 437/437 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cdn4.mswhs.com

Served from: www.mswhs.com @ 2012-05-25 00:30:59 -->
