<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Building a Energy Efficient Windows Home Server</title> <atom:link href="http://www.mswhs.com/2008/09/building-a-energy-efficient-windows-home-server/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/09/building-a-energy-efficient-windows-home-server/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 02:23:14 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Tim</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/09/building-a-energy-efficient-windows-home-server/comment-page-1/#comment-10367</link> <dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 08:53:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/09/12/building-a-energy-efficient-windows-home-server/#comment-10367</guid> <description>Dear Wy,I am looking for the right stuff to build a WHS with and aim for lowest power consumption possible. Googling around, however, I come across a lot of sites talking about &quot;power efficient&quot; computers with a 500W PSU. Do you know an informative site about building server below 100W?Thanks in advance,
Tim</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Wy,</p><p>I am looking for the right stuff to build a WHS with and aim for lowest power consumption possible. Googling around, however, I come across a lot of sites talking about &#8220;power efficient&#8221; computers with a 500W PSU. Do you know an informative site about building server below 100W?</p><p>Thanks in advance,<br
/> Tim</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wy</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/09/building-a-energy-efficient-windows-home-server/comment-page-1/#comment-10366</link> <dc:creator>Wy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 08:12:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/09/12/building-a-energy-efficient-windows-home-server/#comment-10366</guid> <description>Yes mine does run WHS and is current in a rackmount case. But I also have similar systems for other places... desktop (T7200 MoDT), HTPC (T5500 MoDT), spare PC (Pentium-M), car PC (D201GLY), etc... I am into the whole low-power consumption movement.And yep I know about Tranquil PC. In fact I live not too far from them.I really like that you have taken the initiative. So many people I have seen just slap some old banger Pentium-4 plus as many old low capacity spare hard drives as possible, resulting in a machine that takes 200W+ which is no better than a 20W one. A 3.06GHz Pentium-4 is no better than a 1.2GHz C7 on a WHS. Likewise six 160GB drives is no better than a single 1TB drive!!It drives me mad sometimes...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes mine does run WHS and is current in a rackmount case. But I also have similar systems for other places&#8230; desktop (T7200 MoDT), HTPC (T5500 MoDT), spare PC (Pentium-M), car PC (D201GLY), etc&#8230; I am into the whole low-power consumption movement.</p><p>And yep I know about Tranquil PC. In fact I live not too far from them.</p><p>I really like that you have taken the initiative. So many people I have seen just slap some old banger Pentium-4 plus as many old low capacity spare hard drives as possible, resulting in a machine that takes 200W+ which is no better than a 20W one. A 3.06GHz Pentium-4 is no better than a 1.2GHz C7 on a WHS. Likewise six 160GB drives is no better than a single 1TB drive!!</p><p>It drives me mad sometimes&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ade</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/09/building-a-energy-efficient-windows-home-server/comment-page-1/#comment-10365</link> <dc:creator>Ade</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:20:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/09/12/building-a-energy-efficient-windows-home-server/#comment-10365</guid> <description>Wy,It&#039;s definitely possible to do better than 37W. The Tranquil PC guys have several systems that come in around the 20W mark but they seem to know what they&#039;re doing on the hardware front. I&#039;m no expert I just assembled a system from the best off the shelf parts I could find.Does your system run WHS?Ade</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wy,</p><p>It&#8217;s definitely possible to do better than 37W. The Tranquil PC guys have several systems that come in around the 20W mark but they seem to know what they&#8217;re doing on the hardware front. I&#8217;m no expert I just assembled a system from the best off the shelf parts I could find.</p><p>Does your system run WHS?</p><p>Ade</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wy</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/09/building-a-energy-efficient-windows-home-server/comment-page-1/#comment-10364</link> <dc:creator>Wy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:27:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/09/12/building-a-energy-efficient-windows-home-server/#comment-10364</guid> <description>It is interesting what someone defines &quot;energy efficient&quot;.My VIA EPIA + two 500GB 2.5&quot; laptop drives machine uses about 21W idle on a PicoPSU. I so wish Intel would release an Atom board with a proper energy efficient (i.e. non-945) chipset.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting what someone defines &#8220;energy efficient&#8221;.</p><p>My VIA EPIA + two 500GB 2.5&#8243; laptop drives machine uses about 21W idle on a PicoPSU. I so wish Intel would release an Atom board with a proper energy efficient (i.e. non-945) chipset.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ade</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/09/building-a-energy-efficient-windows-home-server/comment-page-1/#comment-10363</link> <dc:creator>Ade</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 04:29:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/09/12/building-a-energy-efficient-windows-home-server/#comment-10363</guid> <description>I have power numbers for this now. When idle it uses 37W on average. More details on this here.http://www.ademiller.com/blogs/tech/2008/09/building-a-green-windows-home-server-the-37-watt-server/If anyone has other data on their builds I&#039;d love to hear about it.Ade</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have power numbers for this now. When idle it uses 37W on average. More details on this here.</p><p><a
href="http://www.ademiller.com/blogs/tech/2008/09/building-a-green-windows-home-server-the-37-watt-server/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ademiller.com/blogs/tech/2008/09/building-a-green-windows-home-server-the-37-watt-server/</a></p><p>If anyone has other data on their builds I&#8217;d love to hear about it.</p><p>Ade</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 29/35 queries in 0.009 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 420/420 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cdn4.mswhs.com

Served from: www.mswhs.com @ 2012-05-24 23:52:56 -->
