http://www.mswhs.com/2008/08/why-doesnt-windows-home-server-use-raid/ Tue, 22 May 2012 02:23:14 +0000 hourly 1 http://www.mswhs.com/2008/08/why-doesnt-windows-home-server-use-raid/comment-page-1/#comment-10259 Roger Sat, 16 Aug 2008 17:15:33 +0000 http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/08/13/why-doesnt-windows-home-server-use-raid/#comment-10259 Not to mention canceling a backup can take a while (several minutes to hours), as the copy of the current 4-10+GB chunk must complete before the cancel can be completed. That's in addition to experiencing decreased performance for streaming, slow Console response, etc... Not to mention canceling a backup can take a while (several minutes to hours), as the copy of the current 4-10+GB chunk must complete before the cancel can be completed. That’s in addition to experiencing decreased performance for streaming, slow Console response, etc…

]]> http://www.mswhs.com/2008/08/why-doesnt-windows-home-server-use-raid/comment-page-1/#comment-10258 Greg Sat, 16 Aug 2008 17:08:14 +0000 http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/08/13/why-doesnt-windows-home-server-use-raid/#comment-10258 WHS was sold as a centralized storage solution, which came with a backup feature, which isn't the same as to say, a backup server dude! WHS was sold as a centralized storage solution, which came with a backup feature, which isn’t the same as to say, a backup server dude!

]]>