<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Live Mesh on Windows Home Server</title> <atom:link href="http://www.mswhs.com/2008/07/live-mesh-on-windows-home-server/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/07/live-mesh-on-windows-home-server/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 02:23:14 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Dave</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/07/live-mesh-on-windows-home-server/comment-page-1/#comment-10191</link> <dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:58:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/07/28/live-mesh-on-windows-home-server/#comment-10191</guid> <description>Not advisable, sure, but is it theoretically possible?  If the filter operates at the share level, then I guess not; but if it operates at the file level (and the shares are simply unmodified Windows shares to those folders), then I don&#039;t see why it wouldn&#039;t work or would be any less safe than how file operations over the shares work.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not advisable, sure, but is it theoretically possible?  If the filter operates at the share level, then I guess not; but if it operates at the file level (and the shares are simply unmodified Windows shares to those folders), then I don&#8217;t see why it wouldn&#8217;t work or would be any less safe than how file operations over the shares work.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andrew</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/07/live-mesh-on-windows-home-server/comment-page-1/#comment-10190</link> <dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:27:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/07/28/live-mesh-on-windows-home-server/#comment-10190</guid> <description>Wow Chris, self-promote much?It&#039;s still not advisable to run Mesh on WHS until they make it work with UNC paths.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow Chris, self-promote much?</p><p>It&#8217;s still not advisable to run Mesh on WHS until they make it work with UNC paths.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dave</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/07/live-mesh-on-windows-home-server/comment-page-1/#comment-10189</link> <dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 04:24:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/07/28/live-mesh-on-windows-home-server/#comment-10189</guid> <description>My question is, is it actually safe to add a folder in D:\shares to the Mesh?  If I add files to the folder from another computer, does it sync correctly to WHS and - more importantly - does it sync correctly within WHS (via the migrator)?  I&#039;d really love to hear some opinions on this.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My question is, is it actually safe to add a folder in D:\shares to the Mesh?  If I add files to the folder from another computer, does it sync correctly to WHS and &#8211; more importantly &#8211; does it sync correctly within WHS (via the migrator)?  I&#8217;d really love to hear some opinions on this.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JohnCz</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/07/live-mesh-on-windows-home-server/comment-page-1/#comment-10188</link> <dc:creator>JohnCz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:10:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/07/28/live-mesh-on-windows-home-server/#comment-10188</guid> <description>I&#039;m curious what scenarios folks would use Live Mesh with WHS for.  In a way, Live Mesh threatens various aspects of WHS (remote access, sharing and eventually application add-ons).  I mean if Live Mesh is released with a 1TB storage option then what do we need WHS for.  That may happen 10 years from now but we all know the bandwidth is just not there today to make it universally viable.  So where are the synergy opportunities between Live Mesh &amp; WHS today??  I don&#039;t even think syncing 50GB+ of Music &amp; Video libraries is practical with todays broadband.  If its primarily text documents &amp; spreadsheets..then Office Live Workspace and/or SkyDrive is adequate for that.  The key I believe in WHS/Live Mesh synergy will be what becomes of Live Mesh applications &amp; APIs.  What are your thoughts?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious what scenarios folks would use Live Mesh with WHS for.  In a way, Live Mesh threatens various aspects of WHS (remote access, sharing and eventually application add-ons).  I mean if Live Mesh is released with a 1TB storage option then what do we need WHS for.  That may happen 10 years from now but we all know the bandwidth is just not there today to make it universally viable.  So where are the synergy opportunities between Live Mesh &amp; WHS today??  I don&#8217;t even think syncing 50GB+ of Music &amp; Video libraries is practical with todays broadband.  If its primarily text documents &amp; spreadsheets..then Office Live Workspace and/or SkyDrive is adequate for that.  The key I believe in WHS/Live Mesh synergy will be what becomes of Live Mesh applications &amp; APIs.  What are your thoughts?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Christopher Price</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/07/live-mesh-on-windows-home-server/comment-page-1/#comment-10187</link> <dc:creator>Christopher Price</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 06:21:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/07/28/live-mesh-on-windows-home-server/#comment-10187</guid> <description>Old news really, I broke the news on it over a week ago:http://www.christopherprice.net/live-mesh-now-does-windows-server-now-wheres-the-zones-402.htmlI would strongly recommend my guide over the one linked in the article... it&#039;s a lot easier to install on WHS than on Server 2008.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Old news really, I broke the news on it over a week ago:</p><p><a
href="http://www.christopherprice.net/live-mesh-now-does-windows-server-now-wheres-the-zones-402.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.christopherprice.net/live-mesh-now-does-windows-server-now-wheres-the-zones-402.html</a></p><p>I would strongly recommend my guide over the one linked in the article&#8230; it&#8217;s a lot easier to install on WHS than on Server 2008.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 29/35 queries in 0.013 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 420/420 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cdn4.mswhs.com

Served from: www.mswhs.com @ 2012-05-24 23:03:32 -->
