Comments on: Hi-Grade Home-serv 2000 Reviewed http://www.mswhs.com/2008/07/hi-grade-home-serv-2000-reviewed/ Wed, 22 Feb 2012 06:58:54 +0000 hourly 1 By: Hi-Grade Home-serv 2000 at WHS.rd http://www.mswhs.com/2008/07/hi-grade-home-serv-2000-reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-10119 Hi-Grade Home-serv 2000 at WHS.rd Sat, 14 Mar 2009 03:18:31 +0000 http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/07/17/hi-grade-home-serv-2000-reviewed/#comment-10119 [...] en MSwhs.com [ http://mswhs.com/2008/07/17/hi-grade-home-serv-2000-reviewed/ ] el review de un servidor pre-build con Windows Home Server, de un total de 5 estrellas solo le [...] [...] en MSwhs.com [ http://mswhs.com/2008/07/17/hi-grade-home-serv-2000-reviewed/ ] el review de un servidor pre-build con Windows Home Server, de un total de 5 estrellas solo le [...]

]]> By: TheHome Server Show 10 - News and Review http://www.mswhs.com/2008/07/hi-grade-home-serv-2000-reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-10118 TheHome Server Show 10 - News and Review Fri, 18 Jul 2008 19:24:05 +0000 http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/07/17/hi-grade-home-serv-2000-reviewed/#comment-10118 [...] MSWHS - Hi Grade Home Server Review [...] [...] MSWHS – Hi Grade Home Server Review [...]

]]> By: JohnBick http://www.mswhs.com/2008/07/hi-grade-home-serv-2000-reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-10117 JohnBick Fri, 18 Jul 2008 01:50:10 +0000 http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/07/17/hi-grade-home-serv-2000-reviewed/#comment-10117 That is a poor quality review. While the conclusions seem valid, the author is not familiar with WHS, does not know what to expect and it shows. And it should stream just fine with a 100Mb/s link (and no gigabit) -- the audio/sound should not be breaking up. In fact, it is so poor I wonder if he set it up correctly. The breakup is consistent with a poor interconnection and the author complains about transfer performance -- but does not quantify it. Maybe the unit is not as bad as claimed!?? And he certainly does not understand much about the WHS backup technology. They should re-do the review using someone who knows and understands the technology. This hurts the entire community, not just that one box. (I tried to post a direct reply but somehow my ID there is messed up and when I tried to get a new one it never sent the confirmation. If someone wants to pass this along feel free to do so.) That is a poor quality review. While the conclusions seem valid, the author is not familiar with WHS, does not know what to expect and it shows. And it should stream just fine with a 100Mb/s link (and no gigabit) — the audio/sound should not be breaking up.

In fact, it is so poor I wonder if he set it up correctly. The breakup is consistent with a poor interconnection and the author complains about transfer performance — but does not quantify it. Maybe the unit is not as bad as claimed!??

And he certainly does not understand much about the WHS backup technology.

They should re-do the review using someone who knows and understands the technology. This hurts the entire community, not just that one box.

(I tried to post a direct reply but somehow my ID there is messed up and when I tried to get a new one it never sent the confirmation. If someone wants to pass this along feel free to do so.)

]]>