<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: What&#039;s New in Windows Search 4.0</title> <atom:link href="http://www.mswhs.com/2008/06/whats-new-in-windows-search-40/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/06/whats-new-in-windows-search-40/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 02:23:14 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Everton</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/06/whats-new-in-windows-search-40/comment-page-1/#comment-9986</link> <dc:creator>Everton</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 11:43:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/06/14/whats-new-in-windows-search-40/#comment-9986</guid> <description>HiDoes Windows Search 4.0 play any role in speeding up clients finding files on the server e.g. Media Centers indexing music libraries?  Or, does it just help searching for files locally on the server?  I&#039;m tempted to disable it as I don&#039;t search for files on my server.ThanksEB</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p><p>Does Windows Search 4.0 play any role in speeding up clients finding files on the server e.g. Media Centers indexing music libraries?  Or, does it just help searching for files locally on the server?  I&#8217;m tempted to disable it as I don&#8217;t search for files on my server.</p><p>Thanks</p><p>EB</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Harnser</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/06/whats-new-in-windows-search-40/comment-page-1/#comment-9985</link> <dc:creator>Harnser</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 14:22:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/06/14/whats-new-in-windows-search-40/#comment-9985</guid> <description>Just search the web for all the WHS owners who have error 3090 issues that cripple WHS due to windows search. I&#039;m following the advice to switch off the service and see if that resolves the repeated failures I&#039;m getting.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just search the web for all the WHS owners who have error 3090 issues that cripple WHS due to windows search. I&#8217;m following the advice to switch off the service and see if that resolves the repeated failures I&#8217;m getting.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jon&#8217;s Geek Stuff &#8230; &#38; Stuff &#187; WHS What’s New in Windows Search 4.0</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/06/whats-new-in-windows-search-40/comment-page-1/#comment-9984</link> <dc:creator>Jon&#8217;s Geek Stuff &#8230; &#38; Stuff &#187; WHS What’s New in Windows Search 4.0</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:26:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/06/14/whats-new-in-windows-search-40/#comment-9984</guid> <description>[...] WHS What’s New in Windows Search 4.0 [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] WHS What’s New in Windows Search 4.0 [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: James</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/06/whats-new-in-windows-search-40/comment-page-1/#comment-9983</link> <dc:creator>James</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 07:27:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/06/14/whats-new-in-windows-search-40/#comment-9983</guid> <description>Not a problem on my WHS either</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a problem on my WHS either</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Aaron</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/06/whats-new-in-windows-search-40/comment-page-1/#comment-9982</link> <dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:52:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/06/14/whats-new-in-windows-search-40/#comment-9982</guid> <description>Works fine on my WHS box.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Works fine on my WHS box.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dave</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/06/whats-new-in-windows-search-40/comment-page-1/#comment-9981</link> <dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:43:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/06/14/whats-new-in-windows-search-40/#comment-9981</guid> <description>Who&#039;s saying it doesn&#039;t work?  Sources, please.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;s saying it doesn&#8217;t work?  Sources, please.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brian</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/06/whats-new-in-windows-search-40/comment-page-1/#comment-9980</link> <dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:10:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/06/14/whats-new-in-windows-search-40/#comment-9980</guid> <description>WDS is also a problematic even running on PC clients! PC performance takes a big hit when using WD4, as the darn thing just doesn&#039;t know when to give it a break. There&#039;s no end user control over the WS4 system tray bar icon to relinquish indexing!  The thing just keeps using up CPU cycles, hogging ram memory, lugging along in the background.Clearly, Microsoft isn&#039;t  going to be able to sell this to anyone, and being how it doesn&#039;t work correctly on WHS, nobody is going to want to use it even for free.Then there is already a better Desktop Search available, it&#039;s called &quot;Copernic Desktop Search&quot;.  It works, all the time and is absolutely given away for FREE.You can download it from here.
www.copernic.com/en/products/desktop-search/</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WDS is also a problematic even running on PC clients! PC performance takes a big hit when using WD4, as the darn thing just doesn&#8217;t know when to give it a break. There&#8217;s no end user control over the WS4 system tray bar icon to relinquish indexing!  The thing just keeps using up CPU cycles, hogging ram memory, lugging along in the background.</p><p>Clearly, Microsoft isn&#8217;t  going to be able to sell this to anyone, and being how it doesn&#8217;t work correctly on WHS, nobody is going to want to use it even for free.</p><p>Then there is already a better Desktop Search available, it&#8217;s called &#8220;Copernic Desktop Search&#8221;.  It works, all the time and is absolutely given away for FREE.</p><p>You can download it from here.<br
/> <a
href="http://www.copernic.com/en/products/desktop-search/" rel="nofollow">http://www.copernic.com/en/products/desktop-search/</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Google Rocks</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/06/whats-new-in-windows-search-40/comment-page-1/#comment-9979</link> <dc:creator>Google Rocks</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 21:25:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/06/14/whats-new-in-windows-search-40/#comment-9979</guid> <description>Windows Search 4 just doesn&#039;t work with Windows Home Server. In fact, Windows Search 1-2-3 and now 4, have all been plagued with a host of issues.Does it work? When will it work? Not in WHS!Try WD5 beta coming soon!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows Search 4 just doesn&#8217;t work with Windows Home Server. In fact, Windows Search 1-2-3 and now 4, have all been plagued with a host of issues.</p><p>Does it work? When will it work? Not in WHS!</p><p>Try WD5 beta coming soon!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 29/38 queries in 0.015 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 471/471 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cdn4.mswhs.com

Served from: www.mswhs.com @ 2012-05-24 20:53:57 -->
