Let’s see, the first post tells us that the beta PP1 has bugs and hasn’t RTM’d yet (someone should look up the definition of “beta”), then points out that the data corruption bug wasn’t fixed prior to PP1. That man is a genius.

The second post links to an entry from January 1st, trying to trick us into thinking that this somehow proves the data corruption bug isn’t fixed in PP1. Interesting logic.

The third one (my personal favorite) points at about 6 non-WHS related topics to make a point that no one can understand. You sir must be a Rhodes Scholar. Either that or a politician.

Utter nonsense.

The Windows Home Server Disk Management Add-In has compatibility issues with Power Pack 1, and yet Gaen Smith only thinks to advertise WHS by claiming his own experience insures the rest of ours…

PP1 is full of unresolved issues, it’s NOT even RTM yet, being still BETA for a good reason. That being there’s bugs in the product, still needing to be resolved here.

Unfortunately, even with PP1 WHS remains to be without the means for end users to backup the WHS operating system still.

And just what does, “When the corruption issue first raised it’s ugly head it hit me pretty hard” suppose to mean? That even with PP1, the darn bloody KB 946676 data corruption defect still isn’t fixed???

What’s the point of using WHS when it clearly remains broken, still with data corruption, despite having waited since last year to be resolved by Microsoft?

Microsoft’s new matto, “Does it Work” as we already know it, “Doesn’t Play for Sure” thanks to Microsoft DRM.