<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: What Is Your Backup Strategy?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.mswhs.com/2008/04/what-is-your-backup-strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/04/what-is-your-backup-strategy/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 02:23:14 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Lido_15</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/04/what-is-your-backup-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-13478</link> <dc:creator>Lido_15</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 19:10:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/what-is-your-backup-strategy/#comment-13478</guid> <description>So I recommend you using an online backup service copies it runs continuously in the background so you don&#039;t have to remember to backup your files and are inexpensive. Personally I use ZenOK Online Backup 2011. and it does pretty good (http://onlinebackup.zenok.com/)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I recommend you using an online backup service copies it runs continuously in the background so you don&#8217;t have to remember to backup your files and are inexpensive. Personally I use ZenOK Online Backup 2011. and it does pretty good (<a
href="http://onlinebackup.zenok.com/" rel="nofollow">http://onlinebackup.zenok.com/</a>)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sukhjit Singh</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/04/what-is-your-backup-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-9644</link> <dc:creator>Sukhjit Singh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:24:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/what-is-your-backup-strategy/#comment-9644</guid> <description>Backing up is becoming more of an issue for home user with all the media stored on on home computers.The main conclusion I came to in my blog was that the best backup solution is to have an external hard drive because you get large storage, decent transfer rates, low cost per gigabyte and they are portable.Whatever backup device you choose you will have to marry it to an automated backup system. I like SyncToy and Robocopy for this.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Backing up is becoming more of an issue for home user with all the media stored on on home computers.</p><p>The main conclusion I came to in my blog was that the best backup solution is to have an external hard drive because you get large storage, decent transfer rates, low cost per gigabyte and they are portable.</p><p>Whatever backup device you choose you will have to marry it to an automated backup system. I like SyncToy and Robocopy for this.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dave</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/04/what-is-your-backup-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-9643</link> <dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 19:00:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/what-is-your-backup-strategy/#comment-9643</guid> <description>Find me something that works just as well or better out-of-the-box.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Find me something that works just as well or better out-of-the-box.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Aaron</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/04/what-is-your-backup-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-9642</link> <dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 00:45:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/what-is-your-backup-strategy/#comment-9642</guid> <description>After evaluating several of the alternatives, I&#039;m using WHS for backups.  It&#039;s been 100% solid.  I also keep another HD at my parents&#039; house (200 miles away) for geographic redundancy.  Barring an incalculable coincidence or nuclear fallout of the entire Northeast I think my important stuff is pretty well protected.  This is mostly family photos, my music collection, and archived email.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After evaluating several of the alternatives, I&#8217;m using WHS for backups.  It&#8217;s been 100% solid.  I also keep another HD at my parents&#8217; house (200 miles away) for geographic redundancy.  Barring an incalculable coincidence or nuclear fallout of the entire Northeast I think my important stuff is pretty well protected.  This is mostly family photos, my music collection, and archived email.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Technorati</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/04/what-is-your-backup-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-9641</link> <dc:creator>Technorati</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 23:37:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/what-is-your-backup-strategy/#comment-9641</guid> <description>It&#039;s bad enough to know WHS has got a proven data corruption design flaw in it&#039;s WHS Drive Extender code.But now, according to Microsoft representatives, changes introduced in Vista SP1 affect how Microsoft&#039;s SQL Server database behaves in certain situations, potentially resulting in data loss or corruption.There&#039;s been no word yet on when the bugs will be patched also. Maybe it&#039;s just bad luck that Microsoft&#039;s own software can corrupt data when the OS updates are applied...Until we get more information about exactly what causes the data corruption, we have to assume that this same gotcha might be lurking out there for other business applications, as well, just as KB 946676 is doing for WHS!What&#039;s going on with Microsoft these days?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s bad enough to know WHS has got a proven data corruption design flaw in it&#8217;s WHS Drive Extender code.</p><p>But now, according to Microsoft representatives, changes introduced in Vista SP1 affect how Microsoft&#8217;s SQL Server database behaves in certain situations, potentially resulting in data loss or corruption.</p><p>There&#8217;s been no word yet on when the bugs will be patched also. Maybe it&#8217;s just bad luck that Microsoft&#8217;s own software can corrupt data when the OS updates are applied&#8230;</p><p>Until we get more information about exactly what causes the data corruption, we have to assume that this same gotcha might be lurking out there for other business applications, as well, just as KB 946676 is doing for WHS!</p><p>What&#8217;s going on with Microsoft these days?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 29/35 queries in 0.012 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 420/420 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cdn4.mswhs.com

Served from: www.mswhs.com @ 2012-05-24 17:09:28 -->
