I stand by Shawn, as his statement is valid. WHS users didn’t buy beta quality for their money. They paid for complete version, for full expectations of actually using their software product.

And why shouldn’t third party add-ins be fully tested before their unleashed to the general public? How about the next time Trent goes in to the doctor’s office, he will get beta medicine for his retail hospital bill!

Why not just have Trent pay for our WHS as full price and then he can workout all them bugs for us for FREE! As most of us didn’t sign up for this dude, that’s why!

We don’t want to be tinkering around, beta testing our family photos, financial records, home videos having paid for final retail complete working versions!

It is another thing altogether to purposefully frame the wording of your post in such a way as to proport to provide useful feedback on Rick Drasch’s product, but in fact is nothing more than a fustrated personal rant on your impression of the quality of the software used with WHS and/or the quality of WHS itself.

There are other forums for personal rants and flames – not here.

What was the purpose of having a consistency check for in the first place if you’re side stepping around it now?

Sort of sounds like to me, “Let’s just NOT care about what was changed, and see what can happen” to be experiencing yet another “wow” for you…

This is typical beta quality software again being used in WHS.