<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Norco DS-520G Network Storage Appliance Review</title> <atom:link href="http://www.mswhs.com/2008/02/norco-ds-520g-network-storage-appliance-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/02/norco-ds-520g-network-storage-appliance-review/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 02:23:14 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Nick Easton</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/02/norco-ds-520g-network-storage-appliance-review/comment-page-1/#comment-8934</link> <dc:creator>Nick Easton</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:49:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/02/19/norco-ds-520g-network-storage-appliance-review/#comment-8934</guid> <description>Correction:  I re-read the review and saw that it was the NAS device; mine was the eSata.My comment on NAS devices (I replaced a Buffalo raid 5 with the Norco eSata) is that i/o is extremely slow, much slower that my WHS, and I wouldn&#039;t touch NAS again for that reason...I deal with storage and manipulation of several hundred thousand files.  Maybe the i/o speed problem was a design deficiency within the Buffalo op system</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction:  I re-read the review and saw that it was the NAS device; mine was the eSata.</p><p>My comment on NAS devices (I replaced a Buffalo raid 5 with the Norco eSata) is that i/o is extremely slow, much slower that my WHS, and I wouldn&#8217;t touch NAS again for that reason&#8230;I deal with storage and manipulation of several hundred thousand files.  Maybe the i/o speed problem was a design deficiency within the Buffalo op system</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nick Easton</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/02/norco-ds-520g-network-storage-appliance-review/comment-page-1/#comment-8933</link> <dc:creator>Nick Easton</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:40:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/02/19/norco-ds-520g-network-storage-appliance-review/#comment-8933</guid> <description>A very important issue that Norco and its retailers forget to mention is that if you want to exceed 2tb you need to run x64 flavors of Windows.    And don&#039;t forget, it&#039;s joined at the waist to a workstation which has the sata pci card installed.  And getting the drivers installed and functional can be a time-sink.  And I lost a couple of drives when the fan seized up.  I will stick to usb externals; however, I must mention that I had 2 Maxtors fry drives within 1 month because of seized fans...I dumped my Norco for WHS recently and never looked back...will keep my Maxtors realizing that they are TEMPORARY storage devices that require daily temperature checks...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very important issue that Norco and its retailers forget to mention is that if you want to exceed 2tb you need to run x64 flavors of Windows.    And don&#8217;t forget, it&#8217;s joined at the waist to a workstation which has the sata pci card installed.  And getting the drivers installed and functional can be a time-sink.  And I lost a couple of drives when the fan seized up.  I will stick to usb externals; however, I must mention that I had 2 Maxtors fry drives within 1 month because of seized fans&#8230;</p><p>I dumped my Norco for WHS recently and never looked back&#8230;will keep my Maxtors realizing that they are TEMPORARY storage devices that require daily temperature checks&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jon&#8217;s Geek Stuff &#8230; &#38; Stuff &#187; Norco DS-520G Network Storage Appliance Review</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/02/norco-ds-520g-network-storage-appliance-review/comment-page-1/#comment-8932</link> <dc:creator>Jon&#8217;s Geek Stuff &#8230; &#38; Stuff &#187; Norco DS-520G Network Storage Appliance Review</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:22:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/02/19/norco-ds-520g-network-storage-appliance-review/#comment-8932</guid> <description>[...] Norco DS-520G Network Storage Appliance Review [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Norco DS-520G Network Storage Appliance Review [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Keith</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/02/norco-ds-520g-network-storage-appliance-review/comment-page-1/#comment-8931</link> <dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 03:44:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.wordpress.com/2008/02/19/norco-ds-520g-network-storage-appliance-review/#comment-8931</guid> <description>I said it way back when you first intro&#039;d this model... I love it!  The size is perfect, the case is so awesome... compact, and the 5 hotswap bays are just perfect, and I also love the dual rj45 ports... BUT, it&#039;s too expensive.  $599 for basically a bare bones system is way too much.  If this thing were even $499, I&#039;d probably still think it was a little pricey, but I&#039;d have one in my house right now.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I said it way back when you first intro&#8217;d this model&#8230; I love it!  The size is perfect, the case is so awesome&#8230; compact, and the 5 hotswap bays are just perfect, and I also love the dual rj45 ports&#8230; BUT, it&#8217;s too expensive.  $599 for basically a bare bones system is way too much.  If this thing were even $499, I&#8217;d probably still think it was a little pricey, but I&#8217;d have one in my house right now.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 29/34 queries in 0.012 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 403/403 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cdn4.mswhs.com

Served from: www.mswhs.com @ 2012-05-24 13:08:16 -->
