<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Microsoft Senior Product Manager Joel Sider talks Windows Home Server</title> <atom:link href="http://www.mswhs.com/2008/02/microsoft-senior-product-manager-joel-sider-talks-windows-home-server/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/02/microsoft-senior-product-manager-joel-sider-talks-windows-home-server/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 02:23:14 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Matt Dillon</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/02/microsoft-senior-product-manager-joel-sider-talks-windows-home-server/comment-page-1/#comment-8837</link> <dc:creator>Matt Dillon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 21:15:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2008/02/04/microsoft-senior-product-manager-joel-sider-talks-windows-home-server/#comment-8837</guid> <description>Every since Jim left Microsoft, it&#039;s been mostly FUD hype. Take for example Vista RTM, full of hardware driver failures. But what&#039;s interesting here is how this happens, and continues to occur. I bet most of you don&#039;t know that Vista RTM kernel was actually ditched to be replaced by Windows Server 2008 kernel in Vista SP1. But at the same time, Microsoft has not updated its Windows Vista Logo program to require drivers to be tested specifically against SP1.So was Vista RTM kernel so bad, it couldn&#039;t be fixed, or was Vista RTM kernel so bad it had to be replaced?  You tell me…Now we come to WHS, built upon Windows Server 2003, which Windows 2008 replaces 2003, but NOT in WHS. To make matter worse, WHS Drive Extender Technology is rumored to be the cause of all the data corruption. And yet, it too goes unresolved even as WHS Power Pack 1 is said to be even more than a service pack release. One can only wonder if this is meant to actually rebuild the system architecture of WHS RTM?Spending more money isn’t the answer… Microsoft has gone a path in the wrong direction. Is it any wonder why Microsoft &quot;Live Search&quot; only holds about 9% of the market?Even with HP&#039;s help, WHS remains to be poorly adapted by the mainstream. It&#039;s buggy, has data corruption issues and is basically &quot;borrowing&quot; third party solutions to appease the geeks, who basically should be using a real server. While the typical home server needs a more robust OEM solution that provides real streaming capabilities instead of focusing upon backup protection, which at this time isn&#039;t able to even protect itself from data corruption.Jim A. is really missed and not forgotten.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every since Jim left Microsoft, it&#8217;s been mostly FUD hype. Take for example Vista RTM, full of hardware driver failures. But what&#8217;s interesting here is how this happens, and continues to occur. I bet most of you don&#8217;t know that Vista RTM kernel was actually ditched to be replaced by Windows Server 2008 kernel in Vista SP1. But at the same time, Microsoft has not updated its Windows Vista Logo program to require drivers to be tested specifically against SP1.</p><p>So was Vista RTM kernel so bad, it couldn&#8217;t be fixed, or was Vista RTM kernel so bad it had to be replaced?  You tell me…</p><p>Now we come to WHS, built upon Windows Server 2003, which Windows 2008 replaces 2003, but NOT in WHS. To make matter worse, WHS Drive Extender Technology is rumored to be the cause of all the data corruption. And yet, it too goes unresolved even as WHS Power Pack 1 is said to be even more than a service pack release. One can only wonder if this is meant to actually rebuild the system architecture of WHS RTM?</p><p>Spending more money isn’t the answer… Microsoft has gone a path in the wrong direction. Is it any wonder why Microsoft &#8220;Live Search&#8221; only holds about 9% of the market?</p><p>Even with HP&#8217;s help, WHS remains to be poorly adapted by the mainstream. It&#8217;s buggy, has data corruption issues and is basically &#8220;borrowing&#8221; third party solutions to appease the geeks, who basically should be using a real server. While the typical home server needs a more robust OEM solution that provides real streaming capabilities instead of focusing upon backup protection, which at this time isn&#8217;t able to even protect itself from data corruption.</p><p>Jim A. is really missed and not forgotten.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jon&#8217;s Geek Stuff &#8230; &#38; Stuff &#187; Microsoft Senior Product Manager Joel Sider talks Windows Home Server</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/02/microsoft-senior-product-manager-joel-sider-talks-windows-home-server/comment-page-1/#comment-8836</link> <dc:creator>Jon&#8217;s Geek Stuff &#8230; &#38; Stuff &#187; Microsoft Senior Product Manager Joel Sider talks Windows Home Server</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 20:31:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2008/02/04/microsoft-senior-product-manager-joel-sider-talks-windows-home-server/#comment-8836</guid> <description>[...] Microsoft Senior Product Manager Joel Sider talks Windows Home Server [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Microsoft Senior Product Manager Joel Sider talks Windows Home Server [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 29/32 queries in 0.010 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 369/369 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cdn4.mswhs.com

Served from: www.mswhs.com @ 2012-05-24 13:00:36 -->
