<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS08-001 for Windows Home Server</title> <atom:link href="http://www.mswhs.com/2008/01/microsoft-security-bulletin-ms08-001-for-windows-home-server/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/01/microsoft-security-bulletin-ms08-001-for-windows-home-server/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 02:23:14 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Philip Churchill</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/01/microsoft-security-bulletin-ms08-001-for-windows-home-server/comment-page-1/#comment-8769</link> <dc:creator>Philip Churchill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:18:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2008/01/26/microsoft-security-bulletin-ms08-001-for-windows-home-server/#comment-8769</guid> <description>Hi Steve,
As long as &quot;Install Updates Automatically&quot; is turned on within the console software, then there is no need to install this patch as it would have been done automatically via Windows Update/Microsoft Update.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steve,<br
/> As long as &#8220;Install Updates Automatically&#8221; is turned on within the console software, then there is no need to install this patch as it would have been done automatically via Windows Update/Microsoft Update.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Philip Churchill</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/01/microsoft-security-bulletin-ms08-001-for-windows-home-server/comment-page-1/#comment-8768</link> <dc:creator>Philip Churchill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:16:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2008/01/26/microsoft-security-bulletin-ms08-001-for-windows-home-server/#comment-8768</guid> <description>Hi Jim Hazlett,
There is no need to Remote Desktop into the Windows Home Server to install this update. Just make sure that within the Console, Settings, General tab that you have &quot;Install Updates Automatically&quot; turned on, if not either do so or click on &quot;Update Now&quot;.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jim Hazlett,<br
/> There is no need to Remote Desktop into the Windows Home Server to install this update. Just make sure that within the Console, Settings, General tab that you have &#8220;Install Updates Automatically&#8221; turned on, if not either do so or click on &#8220;Update Now&#8221;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Leo</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/01/microsoft-security-bulletin-ms08-001-for-windows-home-server/comment-page-1/#comment-8767</link> <dc:creator>Leo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 23:31:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2008/01/26/microsoft-security-bulletin-ms08-001-for-windows-home-server/#comment-8767</guid> <description>One hand doesn&#039;t know what the other hand is doing...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One hand doesn&#8217;t know what the other hand is doing&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Steve</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/01/microsoft-security-bulletin-ms08-001-for-windows-home-server/comment-page-1/#comment-8766</link> <dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:01:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2008/01/26/microsoft-security-bulletin-ms08-001-for-windows-home-server/#comment-8766</guid> <description>Is this patch to be applied manually (i.e. download from Microsoft, move to HS and then run on there) or will it come down on regular Microsoft updates?I tried issuing the download updates from the settings on my HP 475, but it only seemed to download a .Net update and no security patch?If it&#039;s such a vulnerability, why don&#039;t they do it through regular patch push?Anybody know?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this patch to be applied manually (i.e. download from Microsoft, move to HS and then run on there) or will it come down on regular Microsoft updates?</p><p>I tried issuing the download updates from the settings on my HP 475, but it only seemed to download a .Net update and no security patch?</p><p>If it&#8217;s such a vulnerability, why don&#8217;t they do it through regular patch push?</p><p>Anybody know?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Do you have KB941644 Installed? &#171; MS Windows Home Server</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/01/microsoft-security-bulletin-ms08-001-for-windows-home-server/comment-page-1/#comment-8765</link> <dc:creator>Do you have KB941644 Installed? &#171; MS Windows Home Server</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 12:44:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2008/01/26/microsoft-security-bulletin-ms08-001-for-windows-home-server/#comment-8765</guid> <description>[...] KB941644&#160;Installed? January 30, 2008 &#8212; Philip Churchill   We bought to your attention the other day that the vulnerabilities detailed in the MS08-001 security bulletin also affect Windows Home [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] KB941644&nbsp;Installed? January 30, 2008 &#8212; Philip Churchill   We bought to your attention the other day that the vulnerabilities detailed in the MS08-001 security bulletin also affect Windows Home [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Home Server Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; MS08-001 Sicherheitsupdate</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/01/microsoft-security-bulletin-ms08-001-for-windows-home-server/comment-page-1/#comment-8764</link> <dc:creator>Home Server Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; MS08-001 Sicherheitsupdate</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 23:40:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2008/01/26/microsoft-security-bulletin-ms08-001-for-windows-home-server/#comment-8764</guid> <description>[...] Churchill hat uns auf MSWHS.COM heute freundlicherweise auf das Update MS08-001 hingewiesen welches den Windows Server 2003 Small [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Churchill hat uns auf MSWHS.COM heute freundlicherweise auf das Update MS08-001 hingewiesen welches den Windows Server 2003 Small [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jim Hazlett</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/01/microsoft-security-bulletin-ms08-001-for-windows-home-server/comment-page-1/#comment-8763</link> <dc:creator>Jim Hazlett</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 12:39:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2008/01/26/microsoft-security-bulletin-ms08-001-for-windows-home-server/#comment-8763</guid> <description>Should updates like this be installed by using the Remote Desktop into the Windows Home Server?Should I also be using Windows Update when logged into the server?Thanks!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should updates like this be installed by using the Remote Desktop into the Windows Home Server?</p><p>Should I also be using Windows Update when logged into the server?</p><p>Thanks!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Claw</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2008/01/microsoft-security-bulletin-ms08-001-for-windows-home-server/comment-page-1/#comment-8762</link> <dc:creator>Claw</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 03:27:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2008/01/26/microsoft-security-bulletin-ms08-001-for-windows-home-server/#comment-8762</guid> <description>Microsoft&#039;s WHS is what cryptologists disparagingly call &#039;Security through obscurity&#039; (look it up).www.support.microsoft.com/kb/946676 still has no resolution regarding WHS data corruption. Is it any wonder why, everyone at Microsoft is quiting?Open source code is far better... Because,&quot;With closed source code, only relatively few &#039;privileged&#039; individuals can review the code for problems or actually work on fixing them. Being closed source has not prevented the daily exploitation of security holes that never get fixed in Microsoft products so far, while the Linux holes come a few times a year and get fixed.&quot;How much longer must everyone wait, hope and wish Microsoft will fix the WHS data corruption serious problem?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft&#8217;s WHS is what cryptologists disparagingly call &#8216;Security through obscurity&#8217; (look it up).</p><p><a
href="http://www.support.microsoft.com/kb/946676" rel="nofollow">http://www.support.microsoft.com/kb/946676</a> still has no resolution regarding WHS data corruption. Is it any wonder why, everyone at Microsoft is quiting?</p><p>Open source code is far better&#8230; Because,</p><p>&#8220;With closed source code, only relatively few &#8216;privileged&#8217; individuals can review the code for problems or actually work on fixing them. Being closed source has not prevented the daily exploitation of security holes that never get fixed in Microsoft products so far, while the Linux holes come a few times a year and get fixed.&#8221;</p><p>How much longer must everyone wait, hope and wish Microsoft will fix the WHS data corruption serious problem?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 29/38 queries in 0.015 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 471/471 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cdn4.mswhs.com

Served from: www.mswhs.com @ 2012-05-24 09:42:05 -->
