<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Sync WHS</title> <atom:link href="http://www.mswhs.com/2007/12/sync-whs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/12/sync-whs/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 02:23:14 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Jamz Yaneza</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/12/sync-whs/comment-page-1/#comment-8366</link> <dc:creator>Jamz Yaneza</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 22:55:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/12/07/sync-whs/#comment-8366</guid> <description>@Criag: There&#039;s now a better tool called RichCopy that replaces RoboCopy. Testing this right now on my newly built Scaleo WHS. Get it here: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/2009.04.utilityspotlight.aspxAlso, it would be a better idea to use mapped drives instead of directly referencing the folder structure in your example. At least, thats how I&#039;m doing it right now. :-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Criag: There&#8217;s now a better tool called RichCopy that replaces RoboCopy. Testing this right now on my newly built Scaleo WHS. Get it here: <a
href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/2009.04.utilityspotlight.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/2009.04.utilityspotlight.aspx</a></p><p>Also, it would be a better idea to use mapped drives instead of directly referencing the folder structure in your example. At least, thats how I&#8217;m doing it right now. <img
src='http://cdn9.mswhs.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Criag Hilliard</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/12/sync-whs/comment-page-1/#comment-8365</link> <dc:creator>Criag Hilliard</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:23:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/12/07/sync-whs/#comment-8365</guid> <description>Has anyone had problem with Robocopy not copying files in the top level of WHS shares.  Mine will not copy any files that are located in d:\shares\music or d:\shares\videos...  Files and sub-folders under these will copy just not files in top level of each share.  Here&#039;s options i&#039;ve used.
robocopy.exe d:\shares \\other-server\e$\HPServer\d\shares /MIR /XJ /ZB /COPY:DAT /R:0 /W:0 /LOG+:\\other-SERVER\e\BACKUP.LOG /NP /TEE
also tried it like this
robocopy.exe \\HPServer\d$\shares \\other-server\e$\HPServer\d\shares /MIR /XJ /ZB /COPY:DAT /R:0 /W:0 /LOG+:\\other-SERVER\e\BACKUP.LOG /NP /TEE
I get same results from both methods.  The backup log shows that robocopy sees the files in top level of shares, but just doesn&#039;t copy.
3	d:\shares\Music\
76	d:\shares\Videos\
These 3 files in music and 76 files in videos are not in target.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone had problem with Robocopy not copying files in the top level of WHS shares.  Mine will not copy any files that are located in d:\shares\music or d:\shares\videos&#8230;  Files and sub-folders under these will copy just not files in top level of each share.  Here&#8217;s options i&#8217;ve used.<br
/> robocopy.exe d:\shares \\other-server\e$\HPServer\d\shares /MIR /XJ /ZB /COPY:DAT /R:0 /W:0 /LOG+:\\other-SERVER\e\BACKUP.LOG /NP /TEE<br
/> also tried it like this<br
/> robocopy.exe \\HPServer\d$\shares \\other-server\e$\HPServer\d\shares /MIR /XJ /ZB /COPY:DAT /R:0 /W:0 /LOG+:\\other-SERVER\e\BACKUP.LOG /NP /TEE<br
/> I get same results from both methods.  The backup log shows that robocopy sees the files in top level of shares, but just doesn&#8217;t copy.<br
/> 3	d:\shares\Music\<br
/> 76	d:\shares\Videos\<br
/> These 3 files in music and 76 files in videos are not in target.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Philip Churchill</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/12/sync-whs/comment-page-1/#comment-8364</link> <dc:creator>Philip Churchill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:28:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/12/07/sync-whs/#comment-8364</guid> <description>Hi To Krohn,
I personally back up to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bluehost.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;BlueHost.com&lt;/a&gt; via F T P. They give you 1,500 GB of storage space for approx. $7 per month, which is allowed to be used for backup purposes. You can backup the files and sync using either Second Copy or other software. &lt;a href=&quot;http://mswhs.com/2007/10/22/backup-windows-home-server-via-ftp/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;See here&lt;/a&gt; for setup details.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi To Krohn,<br
/> I personally back up to <a
href="http://www.bluehost.com" rel="nofollow">BlueHost.com</a> via F T P. They give you 1,500 GB of storage space for approx. $7 per month, which is allowed to be used for backup purposes. You can backup the files and sync using either Second Copy or other software. <a
href="http://mswhs.com/2007/10/22/backup-windows-home-server-via-ftp/" rel="nofollow">See here</a> for setup details.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: To Krohn</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/12/sync-whs/comment-page-1/#comment-8363</link> <dc:creator>To Krohn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 19:00:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/12/07/sync-whs/#comment-8363</guid> <description>Bob and Philip,
A friend and I are looking to take advantage of each of having a WHS.  We are looking for automatic offsite backup.  We have explored Amazon&#039;s S3 model and it would work.  But why not take advantage of our latent bandwidth in the night on our broadband connections and have his WHS backup mine, and mine his.  100G each would hit the critical files.We are just entering into this and are looking for synchronization options.  We&#039;ll probably do a bulk load via USB drive and then have incremental syncs be done over the internet.  We&#039;ll see how it goes, but if you have ideas on sync architecture and tools, I&#039;d be grateful for some info.Tom</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob and Philip,<br
/> A friend and I are looking to take advantage of each of having a WHS.  We are looking for automatic offsite backup.  We have explored Amazon&#8217;s S3 model and it would work.  But why not take advantage of our latent bandwidth in the night on our broadband connections and have his WHS backup mine, and mine his.  100G each would hit the critical files.</p><p>We are just entering into this and are looking for synchronization options.  We&#8217;ll probably do a bulk load via USB drive and then have incremental syncs be done over the internet.  We&#8217;ll see how it goes, but if you have ideas on sync architecture and tools, I&#8217;d be grateful for some info.</p><p>Tom</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Philip Churchill</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/12/sync-whs/comment-page-1/#comment-8362</link> <dc:creator>Philip Churchill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:14:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/12/07/sync-whs/#comment-8362</guid> <description>Hi Bob Crook,
Two home servers. Now that would be nice.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bob Crook,<br
/> Two home servers. Now that would be nice.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Philip Churchill</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/12/sync-whs/comment-page-1/#comment-8361</link> <dc:creator>Philip Churchill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:09:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/12/07/sync-whs/#comment-8361</guid> <description>Hi Josh,
I have my copy of SyncToy installed on the server. An add-in for WHS implementing SyncToy will be &lt;a href=&quot;http://mswhs.com/2007/11/28/sync-add-in-coming-soon/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;available shortly&lt;/a&gt;.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Josh,<br
/> I have my copy of SyncToy installed on the server. An add-in for WHS implementing SyncToy will be <a
href="http://mswhs.com/2007/11/28/sync-add-in-coming-soon/" rel="nofollow">available shortly</a>.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bob Crook</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/12/sync-whs/comment-page-1/#comment-8360</link> <dc:creator>Bob Crook</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 15:02:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/12/07/sync-whs/#comment-8360</guid> <description>Now wouldn&#039;t this be nice if one had two WHS servers and one could sync between them, and across the Internet?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now wouldn&#8217;t this be nice if one had two WHS servers and one could sync between them, and across the Internet?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Josh</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/12/sync-whs/comment-page-1/#comment-8359</link> <dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:52:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/12/07/sync-whs/#comment-8359</guid> <description>Hello,Do you have this installed on the client computer or WHS?  Which way would be preferred?  I assume this is not a add-in.Josh</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p><p>Do you have this installed on the client computer or WHS?  Which way would be preferred?  I assume this is not a add-in.</p><p>Josh</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 29/38 queries in 0.013 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 475/475 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cdn4.mswhs.com

Served from: www.mswhs.com @ 2012-05-24 07:02:37 -->
