<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Speed up Data Transfer to WHS</title> <atom:link href="http://www.mswhs.com/2007/11/speed-up-data-transfer-to-whs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/11/speed-up-data-transfer-to-whs/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 02:23:14 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Philip Churchill</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/11/speed-up-data-transfer-to-whs/comment-page-1/#comment-8268</link> <dc:creator>Philip Churchill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:35:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/11/23/speed-up-data-transfer-to-whs/#comment-8268</guid> <description>Hi Rick B (RB 1),
Thanks for your comment. The router config feature should now be updated to better implement UPnP.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rick B (RB 1),<br
/> Thanks for your comment. The router config feature should now be updated to better implement UPnP.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Philip Churchill</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/11/speed-up-data-transfer-to-whs/comment-page-1/#comment-8267</link> <dc:creator>Philip Churchill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:34:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/11/23/speed-up-data-transfer-to-whs/#comment-8267</guid> <description>Hi JohnCZ,
Have you posted that suggestion on using some sort of logic control over at the Connect site?
Thanks for the links to the PCI router cards, I didn&#039;t even know they existed. I think Microsoft&#039;s idea was that since nearly everyone has a router it would be a bad idea to integrate one within hardware, but it would be a good idea to have it available as an extra with say the HP EX475.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi JohnCZ,<br
/> Have you posted that suggestion on using some sort of logic control over at the Connect site?<br
/> Thanks for the links to the PCI router cards, I didn&#8217;t even know they existed. I think Microsoft&#8217;s idea was that since nearly everyone has a router it would be a bad idea to integrate one within hardware, but it would be a good idea to have it available as an extra with say the HP EX475.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Windows Observer &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Speed up Data Transfer to WHS &#171; MS Windows Home Server</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/11/speed-up-data-transfer-to-whs/comment-page-1/#comment-8266</link> <dc:creator>Windows Observer &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Speed up Data Transfer to WHS &#171; MS Windows Home Server</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 02:57:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/11/23/speed-up-data-transfer-to-whs/#comment-8266</guid> <description>[...] Speed up Data Transfer to WHS « MS Windows Home Server Last 3 posts in All PostsHow to Upgrade your Laptop Hard Disk With Vista and a USB Hard DriveReview &#8211; Diskeeper 2008 for Windows Home ServerFree Software from TechSmithLast 3 posts in Home ServerReview &#8211; Diskeeper 2008 for Windows Home ServerHP Media Smart Server EX475 Review and Screen ShotsWindows Home Server Update Details and KB ArticleLast 3 posts in MicrosoftReview &#8211; Diskeeper 2008 for Windows Home ServerHP Media Smart Server EX475 Review and Screen ShotsWindows Vista SP1 A Performance Dud?Last 3 posts in Tips &amp; TricksLast 3 posts in WindowsReview &#8211; Diskeeper 2008 for Windows Home ServerHP Media Smart Server EX475 Review and Screen ShotsWindows Vista SP1 A Performance Dud? [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Speed up Data Transfer to WHS « MS Windows Home Server Last 3 posts in All PostsHow to Upgrade your Laptop Hard Disk With Vista and a USB Hard DriveReview &ndash; Diskeeper 2008 for Windows Home ServerFree Software from TechSmithLast 3 posts in Home ServerReview &ndash; Diskeeper 2008 for Windows Home ServerHP Media Smart Server EX475 Review and Screen ShotsWindows Home Server Update Details and KB ArticleLast 3 posts in MicrosoftReview &ndash; Diskeeper 2008 for Windows Home ServerHP Media Smart Server EX475 Review and Screen ShotsWindows Vista SP1 A Performance Dud?Last 3 posts in Tips &amp; TricksLast 3 posts in WindowsReview &ndash; Diskeeper 2008 for Windows Home ServerHP Media Smart Server EX475 Review and Screen ShotsWindows Vista SP1 A Performance Dud? [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JohnCz</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/11/speed-up-data-transfer-to-whs/comment-page-1/#comment-8265</link> <dc:creator>JohnCz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 20:54:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/11/23/speed-up-data-transfer-to-whs/#comment-8265</guid> <description>Rick B has a good point about router info.  If you think about Microsoft&#039;s requirement that WHS be plugged directly into the router and that a router is 24/7 device...the more it becomes apparent the two probably should be merged.  Eliminating power cables and ethernet cable mashup.  I&#039;ve seen PCI card based routers.  Here are a couple...http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleID=1764http://pcpartscollection.stores.yahoo.net/aspcirocaeta.htmlhttp://ecommerce.cadsystem.it/product/d213ead7-4a32-4740-bf76-df03a8084154.aspxAs a side note.  I&#039;m surprised that we haven&#039;t seen more Cable/DSL modem gateways.  Currently there are no gateways on the market with 4 port gigabit switch and N-draft wireless networking.  I think this because many consumers are acquiring their cable/dsl modem from their ISP and ISPs tend to steer clear of home networking or taking on the added costs of integrating wireless capabilities in a modem/gateway.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick B has a good point about router info.  If you think about Microsoft&#8217;s requirement that WHS be plugged directly into the router and that a router is 24/7 device&#8230;the more it becomes apparent the two probably should be merged.  Eliminating power cables and ethernet cable mashup.  I&#8217;ve seen PCI card based routers.  Here are a couple&#8230;</p><p><a
href="http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleID=1764" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleID=1764</a></p><p><a
href="http://pcpartscollection.stores.yahoo.net/aspcirocaeta.html" rel="nofollow">http://pcpartscollection.stores.yahoo.net/aspcirocaeta.html</a></p><p><a
href="http://ecommerce.cadsystem.it/product/d213ead7-4a32-4740-bf76-df03a8084154.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://ecommerce.cadsystem.it/product/d213ead7-4a32-4740-bf76-df03a8084154.aspx</a></p><p>As a side note.  I&#8217;m surprised that we haven&#8217;t seen more Cable/DSL modem gateways.  Currently there are no gateways on the market with 4 port gigabit switch and N-draft wireless networking.  I think this because many consumers are acquiring their cable/dsl modem from their ISP and ISPs tend to steer clear of home networking or taking on the added costs of integrating wireless capabilities in a modem/gateway.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jon&#8217;s Geek Stuff &#8230; &#38; Stuff &#187; Speed up Data Transfer to WHS</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/11/speed-up-data-transfer-to-whs/comment-page-1/#comment-8264</link> <dc:creator>Jon&#8217;s Geek Stuff &#8230; &#38; Stuff &#187; Speed up Data Transfer to WHS</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:01:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/11/23/speed-up-data-transfer-to-whs/#comment-8264</guid> <description>[...] Speed up Data Transfer to WHS [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Speed up Data Transfer to WHS [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rick B (RB 1)</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/11/speed-up-data-transfer-to-whs/comment-page-1/#comment-8263</link> <dc:creator>Rick B (RB 1)</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 09:21:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/11/23/speed-up-data-transfer-to-whs/#comment-8263</guid> <description>Agree with JohnCzWhilst Microsoft have done a great job with WHS and it will only get better interms of features either made by MS or third parties.I do feel however more could of been done/can be done to make it a more consumer friendly experience, like implementing features mentioned above.  One i can think of is the router config feature, currently if it cannot configure your router automatically it refeers you to some help files to manually configure.... sorry but this wont be enough for an average comsumer who has had little or no experiance with networking.RB</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with JohnCz</p><p>Whilst Microsoft have done a great job with WHS and it will only get better interms of features either made by MS or third parties.</p><p>I do feel however more could of been done/can be done to make it a more consumer friendly experience, like implementing features mentioned above.  One i can think of is the router config feature, currently if it cannot configure your router automatically it refeers you to some help files to manually configure&#8230;. sorry but this wont be enough for an average comsumer who has had little or no experiance with networking.</p><p>RB</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JohnCz</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/11/speed-up-data-transfer-to-whs/comment-page-1/#comment-8262</link> <dc:creator>JohnCz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 19:31:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/11/23/speed-up-data-transfer-to-whs/#comment-8262</guid> <description>Good suggestions.  Although Microsoft has no control over #3, #4 and 5, they really should add more intelligence to greatly minimize #1 and #2.  I think its doable.  For example, they could put some sort of logic that halts indexing and duplication until no new data has been written over a certain amount of time.  That way, for most operations users wouldn&#039;t have to be knowledgeable about turn on/off duplication and media sharing.  Consumers shouldn&#039;t have to think about it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good suggestions.  Although Microsoft has no control over #3, #4 and 5, they really should add more intelligence to greatly minimize #1 and #2.  I think its doable.  For example, they could put some sort of logic that halts indexing and duplication until no new data has been written over a certain amount of time.  That way, for most operations users wouldn&#8217;t have to be knowledgeable about turn on/off duplication and media sharing.  Consumers shouldn&#8217;t have to think about it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 29/37 queries in 0.009 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 454/454 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cdn4.mswhs.com

Served from: www.mswhs.com @ 2012-05-23 23:29:22 -->
