<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Should I re-boot WHS?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.mswhs.com/2007/11/should-i-re-boot-whs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/11/should-i-re-boot-whs/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 02:23:14 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Thomas</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/11/should-i-re-boot-whs/comment-page-1/#comment-8217</link> <dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:44:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/11/19/should-i-re-boot-whs/#comment-8217</guid> <description>i dont believe the issue is with rebooting... it with the unexpected. if you tell windows to reboot periodically it will save or finish its work (load balancing) then properly reboot by shutting off all services and turning things back over to the APM.data errors will not hapen by a magicaly random reboots. these are &quot;events&quot; that cause the machine to crash or just loose power randomly that cause issues with data loss. it is perfectly safe to tell windows vista with bitlocker to reboot, just dont force it.scheduled and periodic reboots are part of microsofts best server practices.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dont believe the issue is with rebooting&#8230; it with the unexpected. if you tell windows to reboot periodically it will save or finish its work (load balancing) then properly reboot by shutting off all services and turning things back over to the APM.</p><p>data errors will not hapen by a magicaly random reboots. these are &#8220;events&#8221; that cause the machine to crash or just loose power randomly that cause issues with data loss. it is perfectly safe to tell windows vista with bitlocker to reboot, just dont force it.</p><p>scheduled and periodic reboots are part of microsofts best server practices.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Philip Churchill</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/11/should-i-re-boot-whs/comment-page-1/#comment-8216</link> <dc:creator>Philip Churchill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 11:58:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/11/19/should-i-re-boot-whs/#comment-8216</guid> <description>Thanks for your comment Red Dragon.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment Red Dragon.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Red Dragon</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/11/should-i-re-boot-whs/comment-page-1/#comment-8215</link> <dc:creator>Red Dragon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:59:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/11/19/should-i-re-boot-whs/#comment-8215</guid> <description>It&#039;s always interesting to read how one individual who maybe or not is an expert, which I think NOT, to suggest  he doesn&#039;t think or had experienced a WHS issue regarding WHS rebooting be from either an unexpected reboot like what Philip states when balancing storage or a power cut, that WHS cannot experience a data corruption issue.This is clearly NOT the FACT, as even Philip has stated he knows from two individuals himself this very same issue has indeed happen. I also know that like many other individuals turning off your server unexpectedly, especially during a power cut, and just at the wrong time can result in inconsistencies, data corruption and nasty events thereafter!In fact, just like Philip I also tell everyone it&#039;s a good idea to install a battery backup system, which helps to protect your investment, allowing you to finish what your doing when the electricity does turn off, and so forth.Everyone can prove this to themselves, be with Windows Server 2003, WHS or even 2008... Use your server and in the middle of having to do something turn off the power and see for yourself what happens... And don&#039;t think if the first time everything works, it does... you may not have found out yet where the inconsistency occurred and or the next time it actually will present itself.And if you still don&#039;t believe, I double dare you to try this on any computer running whole disk encryption! Such as with Vista using BitLocker! You have been warned!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s always interesting to read how one individual who maybe or not is an expert, which I think NOT, to suggest  he doesn&#8217;t think or had experienced a WHS issue regarding WHS rebooting be from either an unexpected reboot like what Philip states when balancing storage or a power cut, that WHS cannot experience a data corruption issue.</p><p>This is clearly NOT the FACT, as even Philip has stated he knows from two individuals himself this very same issue has indeed happen. I also know that like many other individuals turning off your server unexpectedly, especially during a power cut, and just at the wrong time can result in inconsistencies, data corruption and nasty events thereafter!</p><p>In fact, just like Philip I also tell everyone it&#8217;s a good idea to install a battery backup system, which helps to protect your investment, allowing you to finish what your doing when the electricity does turn off, and so forth.</p><p>Everyone can prove this to themselves, be with Windows Server 2003, WHS or even 2008&#8230; Use your server and in the middle of having to do something turn off the power and see for yourself what happens&#8230; And don&#8217;t think if the first time everything works, it does&#8230; you may not have found out yet where the inconsistency occurred and or the next time it actually will present itself.</p><p>And if you still don&#8217;t believe, I double dare you to try this on any computer running whole disk encryption! Such as with Vista using BitLocker! You have been warned!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Philip Churchill</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/11/should-i-re-boot-whs/comment-page-1/#comment-8214</link> <dc:creator>Philip Churchill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 10:52:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/11/19/should-i-re-boot-whs/#comment-8214</guid> <description>Hi Jim Lyon,
Thanks for your comment. I know 2 people that this has happened too. The first person had problems due to a power cut and the other after a re-boot when the machine was still balancing storage. You are right in what you explain and yes it shoudnt hurt anything, but for some it is.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jim Lyon,<br
/> Thanks for your comment. I know 2 people that this has happened too. The first person had problems due to a power cut and the other after a re-boot when the machine was still balancing storage. You are right in what you explain and yes it shoudnt hurt anything, but for some it is.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jim Lyon</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/11/should-i-re-boot-whs/comment-page-1/#comment-8213</link> <dc:creator>Jim Lyon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:41:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/11/19/should-i-re-boot-whs/#comment-8213</guid> <description>Respectfully, the suggestion that rebooting will cause loss of your backup database is simply false. By design, when you reboot your computer, the current backup operation (if any) will fail. When the computer restarts, the backup service will undo any partially completed work, leaving the backup database in the same state as it was before the backup started, then record the failure of the previous backup.In my case, I automatically reboot my home server every morning at 5:00 AM, along with any other computers in my household. (I&#039;ve had this policy for many years -- it makes some things work better, and shouldn&#039;t hurt anything.) I&#039;ve never lost my backup database, except when running early pre-release software.-- Jim Lyon
WHS Architect</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Respectfully, the suggestion that rebooting will cause loss of your backup database is simply false. By design, when you reboot your computer, the current backup operation (if any) will fail. When the computer restarts, the backup service will undo any partially completed work, leaving the backup database in the same state as it was before the backup started, then record the failure of the previous backup.</p><p>In my case, I automatically reboot my home server every morning at 5:00 AM, along with any other computers in my household. (I&#8217;ve had this policy for many years &#8212; it makes some things work better, and shouldn&#8217;t hurt anything.) I&#8217;ve never lost my backup database, except when running early pre-release software.</p><p>&#8211; Jim Lyon<br
/> WHS Architect</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Philip Churchill</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/11/should-i-re-boot-whs/comment-page-1/#comment-8212</link> <dc:creator>Philip Churchill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:27:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/11/19/should-i-re-boot-whs/#comment-8212</guid> <description>Thanks to everyone for your comments.Christoph Voigt. This advice does not come from Microsoft. It has come from the experiences of users on the WHS forum.Cylon64. Thanks for the tip. For the ‘Balancing Storage’ message being continually displayed I know others have had the same problem also. You say it may be due to Diskeeper that may be causing this. To isolate the problem temporary uninstall Diskeeper for a few days and see if the problem carries on or disappears.Blue. Thanks for your opinion. Like any product, even after extensive beta testing, version 1 releases do have issues that need sorting out. Along with the majority of users, with my data being duplicated I have had no problem and have lost no data. FREENAS is an excellent product but WHS does so much more.Mary. The risk that WHS will lose data during a power cut etc is the same as it happening to a Windows XP or Vista PC. The risk is there but the likely hood of it happening is minimal. That’s why for complete piece of mind EVERY computer should have a UPS or spike/surge regulator in place.Bob. The following may be of help to you. &lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.microsoft.com/WindowsHomeServer/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=1744726&amp;SiteID=50&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tutorial: How to fix the Network Critical: &quot;database consistency problem&quot; in 10 easy steps or less&lt;/a&gt;.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to everyone for your comments.</p><p>Christoph Voigt. This advice does not come from Microsoft. It has come from the experiences of users on the WHS forum.</p><p>Cylon64. Thanks for the tip. For the ‘Balancing Storage’ message being continually displayed I know others have had the same problem also. You say it may be due to Diskeeper that may be causing this. To isolate the problem temporary uninstall Diskeeper for a few days and see if the problem carries on or disappears.</p><p>Blue. Thanks for your opinion. Like any product, even after extensive beta testing, version 1 releases do have issues that need sorting out. Along with the majority of users, with my data being duplicated I have had no problem and have lost no data. FREENAS is an excellent product but WHS does so much more.</p><p>Mary. The risk that WHS will lose data during a power cut etc is the same as it happening to a Windows XP or Vista PC. The risk is there but the likely hood of it happening is minimal. That’s why for complete piece of mind EVERY computer should have a UPS or spike/surge regulator in place.</p><p>Bob. The following may be of help to you. <a
href="http://forums.microsoft.com/WindowsHomeServer/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=1744726&amp;SiteID=50" rel="nofollow">Tutorial: How to fix the Network Critical: &#8220;database consistency problem&#8221; in 10 easy steps or less</a>.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bobs</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/11/should-i-re-boot-whs/comment-page-1/#comment-8211</link> <dc:creator>Bobs</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:35:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/11/19/should-i-re-boot-whs/#comment-8211</guid> <description>I just performed a reboot and the server restarted in an endless cycle of restarts.  After breaking that cycle, I got the &quot;consistency&quot; error on backups.  Very frustrating as now it is unclear what it actually backed up and what is not.  Hopefully MS will recognize that this is still an incomplete product which will continue to need significant improvements with each &quot;update&quot;.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just performed a reboot and the server restarted in an endless cycle of restarts.  After breaking that cycle, I got the &#8220;consistency&#8221; error on backups.  Very frustrating as now it is unclear what it actually backed up and what is not.  Hopefully MS will recognize that this is still an incomplete product which will continue to need significant improvements with each &#8220;update&#8221;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mary</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/11/should-i-re-boot-whs/comment-page-1/#comment-8210</link> <dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:04:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/11/19/should-i-re-boot-whs/#comment-8210</guid> <description>This is SCARY!!!How many Windows Home Servers will be able to insure their electrical power doesn&#039;t at any time happen to shut off, like during an electrical storm, earthquake, terrorist act, whatever?Heck, my three year old children could unplug the server, if only by accident... Or Grandma hits the cord while vacuuming!And should the Windows Home Server turn off, or even reboot at the wrong time, all my data will be lost!I agree with Blue, this is indeed troubling indeed. My data is more important than to risk using Windows Home Server...Plus, Disk Keeper is a memory hog! Perfect Disk does a much better job, at least on my computers, faster boot up times, quicker access to files, and easier to use.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is SCARY!!!</p><p>How many Windows Home Servers will be able to insure their electrical power doesn&#8217;t at any time happen to shut off, like during an electrical storm, earthquake, terrorist act, whatever?</p><p>Heck, my three year old children could unplug the server, if only by accident&#8230; Or Grandma hits the cord while vacuuming!</p><p>And should the Windows Home Server turn off, or even reboot at the wrong time, all my data will be lost!</p><p>I agree with Blue, this is indeed troubling indeed. My data is more important than to risk using Windows Home Server&#8230;</p><p>Plus, Disk Keeper is a memory hog! Perfect Disk does a much better job, at least on my computers, faster boot up times, quicker access to files, and easier to use.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Blue</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/11/should-i-re-boot-whs/comment-page-1/#comment-8209</link> <dc:creator>Blue</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:50:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/11/19/should-i-re-boot-whs/#comment-8209</guid> <description>All Windows Home Servers require &quot;Reboots&quot; since Microsoft continues to send out patches and hot fixes requiring this type of action. Given how most end users who happen to buy this type of device, it&#039;s a given in that sooner or later someone is going to lose all their data on the Windows Home Server, due to the issue discussed above.Now, it&#039;s one thing to lose some of your data, but who wants to RISK losing all their data stored as backup, just waiting for some issue to happen?The whole point of backup is to have insurance come the time you need it, isn&#039;t that true?So here comes Windows Server 2003 relabeled as Windows Home Server, which tells everyone knowing Microsoft, it&#039;s going to have many bugs and errors, but it&#039;s going to be more difficult now to patch, as it&#039;s build on Windows Server 2003, but hacked for a Home Edition, which has many warnings about NOT using and applying Windows Server 2003 updates, patches and mostly tools.This product is unfinished, but Microsoft is asking for consumers to trust it for their data...I am so disappointed again to see such hype built up around this lame OEM provided , because we really expect a better product, that is safer, more secure and functional...All Microsoft is doing is milking... proclaim yet another &quot;wow&quot; projection, build up expectations, but nobody is reporting the failures... Just like in China, with the Communist Party, it&#039;s all covered up, hidden and punished to get the full real truth...A word for warning to all considering to purchase a Window Home Server device..Don&#039;t!Ask yourself first, who wants to let Microsoft dictate on what device your share your data?Why would anyone want to trust Microsoft when it&#039;s proven NOT to be a security company, but sells security solutions for it&#039;s own products it has NOT made secure?Why have two computers when one can do both? Whenever you browse the Internet, your exchanging between client and server already, so unless your needing a dedicated solution then just build your own...NAS doesn&#039;t have to be Microsoft only...FREENAS is absolutely FREE, and it can everyone plus more, and you get the source code for developing.Oh did I mention WHS only supports just 10 clients only!So if your like me, and have a larger family, NOT a typical &quot;me&quot; generation, but a &quot;we&quot; family, we require a better device that isn&#039;t programmed to lock us out at a specific number...  &quot;that deosn&#039;t support family/friends&quot;.For those really wanting something more, look for the Mesh Networking NAS devices, which support social networking...This is just a rush to market, to offer first a NAS solution by Microsoft...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All Windows Home Servers require &#8220;Reboots&#8221; since Microsoft continues to send out patches and hot fixes requiring this type of action. Given how most end users who happen to buy this type of device, it&#8217;s a given in that sooner or later someone is going to lose all their data on the Windows Home Server, due to the issue discussed above.</p><p>Now, it&#8217;s one thing to lose some of your data, but who wants to RISK losing all their data stored as backup, just waiting for some issue to happen?</p><p>The whole point of backup is to have insurance come the time you need it, isn&#8217;t that true?</p><p>So here comes Windows Server 2003 relabeled as Windows Home Server, which tells everyone knowing Microsoft, it&#8217;s going to have many bugs and errors, but it&#8217;s going to be more difficult now to patch, as it&#8217;s build on Windows Server 2003, but hacked for a Home Edition, which has many warnings about NOT using and applying Windows Server 2003 updates, patches and mostly tools.</p><p>This product is unfinished, but Microsoft is asking for consumers to trust it for their data&#8230;</p><p>I am so disappointed again to see such hype built up around this lame OEM provided , because we really expect a better product, that is safer, more secure and functional&#8230;</p><p>All Microsoft is doing is milking&#8230; proclaim yet another &#8220;wow&#8221; projection, build up expectations, but nobody is reporting the failures&#8230; Just like in China, with the Communist Party, it&#8217;s all covered up, hidden and punished to get the full real truth&#8230;</p><p>A word for warning to all considering to purchase a Window Home Server device..</p><p>Don&#8217;t!</p><p>Ask yourself first, who wants to let Microsoft dictate on what device your share your data?</p><p>Why would anyone want to trust Microsoft when it&#8217;s proven NOT to be a security company, but sells security solutions for it&#8217;s own products it has NOT made secure?</p><p>Why have two computers when one can do both? Whenever you browse the Internet, your exchanging between client and server already, so unless your needing a dedicated solution then just build your own&#8230;</p><p>NAS doesn&#8217;t have to be Microsoft only&#8230;</p><p>FREENAS is absolutely FREE, and it can everyone plus more, and you get the source code for developing.</p><p>Oh did I mention WHS only supports just 10 clients only!</p><p>So if your like me, and have a larger family, NOT a typical &#8220;me&#8221; generation, but a &#8220;we&#8221; family, we require a better device that isn&#8217;t programmed to lock us out at a specific number&#8230;  &#8220;that deosn&#8217;t support family/friends&#8221;.</p><p>For those really wanting something more, look for the Mesh Networking NAS devices, which support social networking&#8230;</p><p>This is just a rush to market, to offer first a NAS solution by Microsoft&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: cylon64</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/11/should-i-re-boot-whs/comment-page-1/#comment-8208</link> <dc:creator>cylon64</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:25:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/11/19/should-i-re-boot-whs/#comment-8208</guid> <description>Thanks&#039; Phil for the info.  It&#039;s a practice that I try to adhere to.  However I have a couple of issues with my installation of WHS that may be of interest to others.I and I know others frequently receive a message from the console stating that the backup service is not running and to &#039;RE-BOOT&#039; the server.  However some people may be unaware that Microsoft&#039;s official recommendation is to actually &#039;Reset&#039; the console itself.  Then log back in and this should be enough to rectify the problem and prevent an unnecessary re-boot.You also mentioned not to reboot the server when the &#039;Balancing Storage&#039; message is displayed.  My problem here is the message is always displayed on my console.  The only thing I can think of is that Diskeeper may be causing this, but whatever I try I cant seem to get the storage balanced.  I know their are plenty of others out there with the same problem. I can only hope a solution arises soon.Nick.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks&#8217; Phil for the info.  It&#8217;s a practice that I try to adhere to.  However I have a couple of issues with my installation of WHS that may be of interest to others.</p><p>I and I know others frequently receive a message from the console stating that the backup service is not running and to &#8216;RE-BOOT&#8217; the server.  However some people may be unaware that Microsoft&#8217;s official recommendation is to actually &#8216;Reset&#8217; the console itself.  Then log back in and this should be enough to rectify the problem and prevent an unnecessary re-boot.</p><p>You also mentioned not to reboot the server when the &#8216;Balancing Storage&#8217; message is displayed.  My problem here is the message is always displayed on my console.  The only thing I can think of is that Diskeeper may be causing this, but whatever I try I cant seem to get the storage balanced.  I know their are plenty of others out there with the same problem. I can only hope a solution arises soon.</p><p>Nick.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Be Careful Rebooting Home Server (And Backup!) : Christopher Price .net</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/11/should-i-re-boot-whs/comment-page-1/#comment-8207</link> <dc:creator>Be Careful Rebooting Home Server (And Backup!) : Christopher Price .net</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:52:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/11/19/should-i-re-boot-whs/#comment-8207</guid> <description>[...] Churchil&#8217;s WHS blog posted an important note about Windows Home Server: be careful when you chose to reboot [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Churchil&#8217;s WHS blog posted an important note about Windows Home Server: be careful when you chose to reboot [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Christoph Voigt</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/11/should-i-re-boot-whs/comment-page-1/#comment-8206</link> <dc:creator>Christoph Voigt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:37:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/11/19/should-i-re-boot-whs/#comment-8206</guid> <description>I wonder if there should be some kind of warning to the user if the server is currently balancing the storage instead only indicating it. Would certainly help some users, I guess.
Btw, is the advice to not reboot WHS one that also comes from MS? Because if so, I&#039;d very much like to hear how the FSC AddIn for automated startup/downtime of WHS does handle the balancing state.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if there should be some kind of warning to the user if the server is currently balancing the storage instead only indicating it. Would certainly help some users, I guess.<br
/> Btw, is the advice to not reboot WHS one that also comes from MS? Because if so, I&#8217;d very much like to hear how the FSC AddIn for automated startup/downtime of WHS does handle the balancing state.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 29/42 queries in 0.014 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 539/539 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cdn4.mswhs.com

Served from: www.mswhs.com @ 2012-05-23 23:25:33 -->
