<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Knowledge Base Updated</title> <atom:link href="http://www.mswhs.com/2007/11/knowledge-base-updated-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/11/knowledge-base-updated-2/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 02:23:14 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Philip Churchill</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/11/knowledge-base-updated-2/comment-page-1/#comment-8137</link> <dc:creator>Philip Churchill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 13:08:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/11/08/knowledge-base-updated-2/#comment-8137</guid> <description>Hi JohnBick,
As you stated the following KB article http://support.microsoft.com/kb/943903/en-us says that &quot;you may experience slow performance on the computer&quot;. Apart from this I can see no issue why you cannot run both together if you really wanted too.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi JohnBick,<br
/> As you stated the following KB article <a
href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/943903/en-us" rel="nofollow">http://support.microsoft.com/kb/943903/en-us</a> says that &#8220;you may experience slow performance on the computer&#8221;. Apart from this I can see no issue why you cannot run both together if you really wanted too.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JohnBick</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/11/knowledge-base-updated-2/comment-page-1/#comment-8136</link> <dc:creator>JohnBick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 23:46:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/11/08/knowledge-base-updated-2/#comment-8136</guid> <description>I am confused. I am still using the WHS Beta and back up to BOTH WHS and OneCare (to different storage media). When I get a WHS server (HP EX475?) I will re-start my WHS backups and, at that time, eliminate the backups in OneCare.In the meantime, is there any reason OTHER THAN PERFORMANCE to avoid using both? I have carefully timed the backups to occur overnight and, after the initial ones, I am seeing no performance impacts on my client PCs.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am confused. I am still using the WHS Beta and back up to BOTH WHS and OneCare (to different storage media). When I get a WHS server (HP EX475?) I will re-start my WHS backups and, at that time, eliminate the backups in OneCare.</p><p>In the meantime, is there any reason OTHER THAN PERFORMANCE to avoid using both? I have carefully timed the backups to occur overnight and, after the initial ones, I am seeing no performance impacts on my client PCs.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 29/32 queries in 0.012 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 369/370 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cdn4.mswhs.com

Served from: www.mswhs.com @ 2012-05-23 23:01:44 -->
