<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Bits and Bobs</title> <atom:link href="http://www.mswhs.com/2007/10/bits-and-bobs-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/10/bits-and-bobs-2/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 02:23:14 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Linux WHS Alternative HipServ &#171; MS Windows Home Server</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/10/bits-and-bobs-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7748</link> <dc:creator>Linux WHS Alternative HipServ &#171; MS Windows Home Server</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 10:39:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/10/16/bits-and-bobs-2/#comment-7748</guid> <description>[...] the past we have posted information about Linux alternatives to Windows home Server including the Ubuntu Home Server Edition [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the past we have posted information about Linux alternatives to Windows home Server including the Ubuntu Home Server Edition [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Philip Churchill</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/10/bits-and-bobs-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7747</link> <dc:creator>Philip Churchill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:05:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/10/16/bits-and-bobs-2/#comment-7747</guid> <description>Hi Graham Wilson,
Thanks for your comment. Yes I used to use the commercial version of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.serverelements.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NASLite&lt;/a&gt; before moving to WHS and it was very good as a central storage medium, but I do prefer WHS since it does so much more, backup etc.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Graham Wilson,<br
/> Thanks for your comment. Yes I used to use the commercial version of <a
href="http://www.serverelements.com/" rel="nofollow">NASLite</a> before moving to WHS and it was very good as a central storage medium, but I do prefer WHS since it does so much more, backup etc.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Graham Wilson</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/10/bits-and-bobs-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7746</link> <dc:creator>Graham Wilson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:03:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/10/16/bits-and-bobs-2/#comment-7746</guid> <description>Hello Philip,Firstly thank you for the execellent newsletter on the Windows Home Server which I am hoping to implement when it is finally available in New Zealand.You mentioned a couple of Linux Home Server products in the current newsletter, so I thought I would just let you know about one that I have been using in a business environment for nearly 3 years.    It is NASlite from serverelements.com.     I have been using the basic free version which runs from a 1.44MHz boot floppy, for storing service manuals (I work in the electronics service industry) and have servers working without  in 3 of our branches.   These pretty much just go and go without any maintenance and seem to recover automatically after power failures (only one is on a UPS). The free version of NASlite is little more than software to turn your PC (100MHz 486 or better) into a storage device (with no security) but the later commercial versions have more features built in (including Raid, auto backups etc) and are very reasonably priced and I am currently experimenting with one of them.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Philip,</p><p>Firstly thank you for the execellent newsletter on the Windows Home Server which I am hoping to implement when it is finally available in New Zealand.</p><p>You mentioned a couple of Linux Home Server products in the current newsletter, so I thought I would just let you know about one that I have been using in a business environment for nearly 3 years.    It is NASlite from serverelements.com.     I have been using the basic free version which runs from a 1.44MHz boot floppy, for storing service manuals (I work in the electronics service industry) and have servers working without  in 3 of our branches.   These pretty much just go and go without any maintenance and seem to recover automatically after power failures (only one is on a UPS). The free version of NASlite is little more than software to turn your PC (100MHz 486 or better) into a storage device (with no security) but the later commercial versions have more features built in (including Raid, auto backups etc) and are very reasonably priced and I am currently experimenting with one of them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Philip Churchill</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/10/bits-and-bobs-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7745</link> <dc:creator>Philip Churchill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:18:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/10/16/bits-and-bobs-2/#comment-7745</guid> <description>Hi Brian,
Thanks for your comment. The UHS project will have Cross-Platform Client Support so Windows, Linux and Macintosh (OSX) client computers will be natively supported.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brian,<br
/> Thanks for your comment. The UHS project will have Cross-Platform Client Support so Windows, Linux and Macintosh (OSX) client computers will be natively supported.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brian</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/10/bits-and-bobs-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7744</link> <dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:07:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/10/16/bits-and-bobs-2/#comment-7744</guid> <description>I was wondering when the Linux community would start work on a competitor to WHS.  I was in the beta test for WHS and was quite impressed with the product, but now being down to one functioning Windows computer alongside the Mac and Linux machines on my network, decided that it wasn&#039;t the product that fit my particular needs.I&#039;d like to see if either of these Linux options has better multi-OS integration than Home Server does.  I&#039;d love to have the ease of WHS backups on Mac and Linux.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering when the Linux community would start work on a competitor to WHS.  I was in the beta test for WHS and was quite impressed with the product, but now being down to one functioning Windows computer alongside the Mac and Linux machines on my network, decided that it wasn&#8217;t the product that fit my particular needs.</p><p>I&#8217;d like to see if either of these Linux options has better multi-OS integration than Home Server does.  I&#8217;d love to have the ease of WHS backups on Mac and Linux.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 29/35 queries in 0.010 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 420/420 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cdn4.mswhs.com

Served from: www.mswhs.com @ 2012-05-23 13:32:12 -->
