Comments on: ATT Comcast Time Warner Blocking Ports – The Debate Continues http://www.mswhs.com/2007/10/att-comcast-time-warner-blocking-ports-the-debate-continues/ Tue, 22 May 2012 02:23:14 +0000 hourly 1 By: webmasterhttp://www.mswhs.com/2007/10/att-comcast-time-warner-blocking-ports-the-debate-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-7968 webmaster Fri, 19 Sep 2008 04:21:40 +0000 http://mswhs.com/2007/10/30/att-comcast-time-warner-blocking-ports-the-debate-continues/#comment-7968 Is this what it looks like when they block?Tracing route to couponseek.net [74.50.3.195] over a maximum of 30 hops:1 2 ms 1 ms 1 ms adsl-75-18-222-100.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net [75. 18.222.100] 2 37 ms 55 ms 32 ms adsl-75-18-223-254.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net [75. 18.223.254] 3 26 ms 34 ms 71 ms 64.164.107.130 4 36 ms 35 ms 29 ms bb1-g3-0.pltnca.sbcglobal.net [151.164.43.54] 5 40 ms 37 ms 35 ms ex1-p9-1.eqsjca.sbcglobal.net [151.164.190.14] 6 41 ms 57 ms 57 ms gar7.sffca.ip.att.net [12.122.79.97] 7 61 ms 68 ms 60 ms tbr1.sffca.ip.att.net [12.122.85.130] 8 71 ms 56 ms 70 ms cr1.sffca.ip.att.net [12.122.19.33] 9 134 ms 85 ms 126 ms cr1.la2ca.ip.att.net [12.122.3.122] 10 132 ms 113 ms 53 ms tbr1.la2ca.ip.att.net [12.122.19.154] 11 57 ms 54 ms 43 ms gar1.lv2nv.ip.att.net [12.123.199.245] 12 * * * Request timed out. 13 61 ms 40 ms 65 ms csr1-ge0921.lv1.marquisnet.com [208.110.166.38]14 58 ms 51 ms 44 ms cust-lunarpages.csr1.lv1.marquisnet.com [208.65. 158.130] 15 67 ms 79 ms 57 ms hafgan.lunarservers.com [74.50.3.195]Trace complete. Is this what it looks like when they block?

Tracing route to couponseek.net [74.50.3.195]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 2 ms 1 ms 1 ms adsl-75-18-222-100.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net [75.
18.222.100]
2 37 ms 55 ms 32 ms adsl-75-18-223-254.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net [75.
18.223.254]
3 26 ms 34 ms 71 ms 64.164.107.130
4 36 ms 35 ms 29 ms bb1-g3-0.pltnca.sbcglobal.net [151.164.43.54]
5 40 ms 37 ms 35 ms ex1-p9-1.eqsjca.sbcglobal.net [151.164.190.14]
6 41 ms 57 ms 57 ms gar7.sffca.ip.att.net [12.122.79.97]
7 61 ms 68 ms 60 ms tbr1.sffca.ip.att.net [12.122.85.130]
8 71 ms 56 ms 70 ms cr1.sffca.ip.att.net [12.122.19.33]
9 134 ms 85 ms 126 ms cr1.la2ca.ip.att.net [12.122.3.122]
10 132 ms 113 ms 53 ms tbr1.la2ca.ip.att.net [12.122.19.154]
11 57 ms 54 ms 43 ms gar1.lv2nv.ip.att.net [12.123.199.245]
12 * * * Request timed out.
13 61 ms 40 ms 65 ms csr1-ge0921.lv1.marquisnet.com [208.110.166.38]

14 58 ms 51 ms 44 ms cust-lunarpages.csr1.lv1.marquisnet.com [208.65.
158.130]
15 67 ms 79 ms 57 ms hafgan.lunarservers.com [74.50.3.195]

Trace complete.

]]> By: Speckledevhttp://www.mswhs.com/2007/10/att-comcast-time-warner-blocking-ports-the-debate-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-7967 Speckledev Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:50:50 +0000 http://mswhs.com/2007/10/30/att-comcast-time-warner-blocking-ports-the-debate-continues/#comment-7967 I've been working with Don quite a bit with this issue and his efforts are being directed at Governor Matt Blunt (Missouri) and City Council members. Seeing how this is an upcoming election year we are both emailing and calling elected officials locally to apply the pressure, but to kill the monopoly of areas specfic to limited choices of ISPs.If everyone affected or not by your ISP would call or email your local officials we can break the barrier!ISP are doing all the can to hide or cover up with "limiting upload/downloads during busy times" to the press and public. This will not only affect WHS, but SharePoint and other software developed for communication will be affected in the long term.Don't forget that Time Warner AT&T and many others are moving towards mobile web applications and service, so this could also have an impact for upgraded mobile packages customers will be paying for.Don't let them limit our access why they increase rates every year for "better service and options". I’ve been working with Don quite a bit with this issue and his efforts are being directed at Governor Matt Blunt (Missouri) and City Council members. Seeing how this is an upcoming election year we are both emailing and calling elected officials locally to apply the pressure, but to kill the monopoly of areas specfic to limited choices of ISPs.

If everyone affected or not by your ISP would call or email your local officials we can break the barrier!

ISP are doing all the can to hide or cover up with “limiting upload/downloads during busy times” to the press and public. This will not only affect WHS, but SharePoint and other software developed for communication will be affected in the long term.

Don’t forget that Time Warner AT&T and many others are moving towards mobile web applications and service, so this could also have an impact for upgraded mobile packages customers will be paying for.

Don’t let them limit our access why they increase rates every year for “better service and options”.

]]> By: reddragon72http://www.mswhs.com/2007/10/att-comcast-time-warner-blocking-ports-the-debate-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-7966 reddragon72 Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:05:15 +0000 http://mswhs.com/2007/10/30/att-comcast-time-warner-blocking-ports-the-debate-continues/#comment-7966 I guess we have to leave this issue upto the covert people. It is only a matter of time before someone or a group of people really go to town on both ISP's and take down there entire network, or even better bug there crappy Sandvine servers. So kick back grab some popcorn and watch the fun begin. I guess we have to leave this issue upto the covert people. It is only a matter of time before someone or a group of people really go to town on both ISP’s and take down there entire network, or even better bug there crappy Sandvine servers. So kick back grab some popcorn and watch the fun begin.

]]>