<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Diskeeper 2008 for Windows Home server</title> <atom:link href="http://www.mswhs.com/2007/08/diskeeper-2008-for-windows-home-server/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/08/diskeeper-2008-for-windows-home-server/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 02:23:14 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Diskeeper Home Server Trial Download &#171; MS Windows Home Server</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/08/diskeeper-2008-for-windows-home-server/comment-page-1/#comment-7187</link> <dc:creator>Diskeeper Home Server Trial Download &#171; MS Windows Home Server</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:54:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/08/31/diskeeper-2008-for-windows-home-server/#comment-7187</guid> <description>[...] September 26th, 2007 &#8212; Philip Churchill   We looked at Diskeeper for Windows Home Server back in August (2007). A defrag tool for our home servers. Since then Diskeeper have been in touch and have given [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] September 26th, 2007 &#8212; Philip Churchill   We looked at Diskeeper for Windows Home Server back in August (2007). A defrag tool for our home servers. Since then Diskeeper have been in touch and have given [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Philip Churchill</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/08/diskeeper-2008-for-windows-home-server/comment-page-1/#comment-7186</link> <dc:creator>Philip Churchill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 20:17:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/08/31/diskeeper-2008-for-windows-home-server/#comment-7186</guid> <description>Sorry lee didn&#039;t understand your question?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry lee didn&#8217;t understand your question?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: lee</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/08/diskeeper-2008-for-windows-home-server/comment-page-1/#comment-7185</link> <dc:creator>lee</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 02:02:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/08/31/diskeeper-2008-for-windows-home-server/#comment-7185</guid> <description>its only listing the first disk there tho unless there is more then one disk in there winder if it can defrag name less disks?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its only listing the first disk there tho unless there is more then one disk in there winder if it can defrag name less disks?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Philip Churchill</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/08/diskeeper-2008-for-windows-home-server/comment-page-1/#comment-7184</link> <dc:creator>Philip Churchill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 21:42:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/08/31/diskeeper-2008-for-windows-home-server/#comment-7184</guid> <description>Thanks for your comments J. Russell and Michiel. It defiantly speeds up the Home Server. As with any PC after a certain amount of time it will defragment but due to the way WHS stores data a dedicated defrag tool has to be used. When released I plan to test it by imaging the server on two machines and defraging one and not the other and posting the results.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments J. Russell and Michiel. It defiantly speeds up the Home Server. As with any PC after a certain amount of time it will defragment but due to the way WHS stores data a dedicated defrag tool has to be used. When released I plan to test it by imaging the server on two machines and defraging one and not the other and posting the results.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michiel</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/08/diskeeper-2008-for-windows-home-server/comment-page-1/#comment-7183</link> <dc:creator>Michiel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 10:42:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/08/31/diskeeper-2008-for-windows-home-server/#comment-7183</guid> <description>I have a couple of questions:What does this more than WHS itself while it is &quot;balancing storage&quot;? Is it saving storage space? Is it boosting the speed? I am not convinced that it saves you time, money or speed things up. (Will it speed up backup recovery?)I&#039;m waiting till you test it and compare WHS with this defrag tool and without. How do you plan to test thisn anyway?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a couple of questions:</p><p>What does this more than WHS itself while it is &#8220;balancing storage&#8221;? Is it saving storage space? Is it boosting the speed? I am not convinced that it saves you time, money or speed things up. (Will it speed up backup recovery?)I&#8217;m waiting till you test it and compare WHS with this defrag tool and without. How do you plan to test thisn anyway?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: J. Russell</title><link>http://www.mswhs.com/2007/08/diskeeper-2008-for-windows-home-server/comment-page-1/#comment-7182</link> <dc:creator>J. Russell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 06:15:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://mswhs.com/2007/08/31/diskeeper-2008-for-windows-home-server/#comment-7182</guid> <description>This is a welcome addition to WHS. I use Diskeeper 2007 pro on my main desktop and it does a great job keeping fragmentation low with it&#039;s automatic defrag. I hope the 2008 version is as good, if not better. Looking forward to it!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a welcome addition to WHS. I use Diskeeper 2007 pro on my main desktop and it does a great job keeping fragmentation low with it&#8217;s automatic defrag. I hope the 2008 version is as good, if not better. Looking forward to it!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 29/36 queries in 0.010 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 437/437 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cdn4.mswhs.com

Served from: www.mswhs.com @ 2012-05-22 13:40:37 -->
